Saturday, April 12, 2008

Yes Virginia, Maryland is a high tax state

Someone must have read my previous post about legislators sending session summary letters or emails since I received the below from my Delegate, Virginia Clagett. Kudos to Delegate Clagett for being proactive and responsive to her constituents. Alas this is likely all to rare but it should be commonplace.

But (and you knew there was a but) a fact check of the Del. Clagett's claim in the first paragraph that "Maryland remains a low-spending State on a per-capita basis" reveals otherwise. Namely, Maryland was not a low-spending State per-capita according to any source I found via Google search ranks Maryland anywhere from 3rd to 20th in per-capita spending. And these rankings don't include the tax increases that have already taken effect! I emailed Del. Clagett to provide a source for her statement but haven't heard back as yet.

The only solace... one of the rankings also included a ranking of  "Return on Tax Dollar" and Maryland ranked 18th. Not great but at least it seems we are getting a fair return on our investment.



Dear Constituent:


Thank you for letting me know your views on so many and various subjects during this year’s Legislative Session. Of course the Budget is the main duty of the Legislature each year. As a result of the 2007 and 2008 sessions, we passed a balanced budget with over $1.1 billion in cuts from the general fund and nearly $1.5 million in cuts from the budget overall. With these cuts, Maryland remains a low-spending State on a per capita basis.


After enormous input from the business community, the Legislature repealed the new tax on computer services that would have come into effect July 1, 2008. That sector of our economy can continue to thrive.


In the Capital Budget our votes provided for $333 million for public school construction, $262 million for higher education facilities, $40 million for environmental programs, as well as, $107.4 million for hospitals, state health facilities, senior centers and juvenile detention facilities.


All of us have been following the drastic foreclosure and housing crisis in our state as well as the nation. We passed legislation to enhance protection for home buyers and those facing foreclosures. Maryland is widely expected to become a national model in solving this mortgage crisis.


One problem that became apparent after the session started was the inability of animal shelters to keep appropriate sedatives for animals in the euthanasia process. Several of us took the lead in restoring animal facilities’ access to those necessary, humane drugs.


As you know, I am on the Environmental Matters Committee and have devoted most of my career to addressing environmental issues. This year was no exception, and the environment faired quite well. The 20 year old Critical Areas legislation got a strong boost and very much needed regulatory enhancement with HB 1253. The buffer zone was increased from 100’ to 200’ and criminal and civil penalties were appropriately increased among other measures.


The Chesapeake and Atlantic Coastal Bays 2010 Trust Fund (HB 369/SB 213) provided the framework for allocating $25 million to control non-point source pollution including projects to 1. enhance agricultural best management practices, 2. address urban and suburban stormwater methods, 3. achieve sustainable forest management and 4. help wetland and stream restoration.


Many energy bills passed that set a goal to reduce statewide energy use 15% by 2012 and to increase the amount of renewable energy sold in Maryland. The settlement between the State and Constellation energy will provide nearly $2 billion in rate relief to customers l. by providing $187 million in rate relief in a one-time $170 refund to 1.1 million ratepayers. Based on projected rates for the coming year, this equates to over a 10% reduction on the total annual bill for more than 50% of all BGE customers. 2. by eliminating a $1.5 billion consumer obligation for the cost of de-commissioning Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant and 3. by protecting $346 million in credits to ratepayers the Legislature secured during the 2006 Special Session.


With regard to social issues, HB 40, providing for flexible leave for working families, passed. Domestic partners will be able to make medical and burial decisions for each other, and they will also have the same tax benefits as married people when transferring property.


The Global Warming Solutions Act of 2008 which aimed to slash greenhouse gas emissions by 25% by 2020 and by 90% by 2050 was killed in the Economic Matters Committee. The push to reduce emissions will be back next year. This is a critical issue, and these goals are realistic and attainable.


Again thank you for your input. You do have an impact on your government, and we need your thoughts.


Sincerely,


Virginia P. Clagett


 

Labels:

2 Comments:

At April 27, 2008 3:00 PM , Blogger justdafacts said...

Peter - Let me help Del. Clagett out here, since I'm sure she's very busy.

Your use of Google is a good start, but next you need to review and analyze the data Google finds for you.

Critics point out that the conservative Tax Foundation skews data to support its anti-tax agenda, but there is broad consensus that most of their studies offer valid, verifiable data with methodology explained for those who want to check it.

Since state government and local government spending is divided differently among the 50 states, the best across the board comparison is the Tax Foundation's "State and Local Spending Per Capita" table, compiled annually.

For example, public libraries might be 100% state funded in one state and 100% county funded in another state, but this table measures all goverment spending in each of the states, from towns, cities, and counties to the state governmen itself.
The most recent table, published June 28, 2007, shows data for 2005, and ranks Maryland 27th from the top of the states in spending per capita.

So we're Number 1 in per capita income, but we're 27th in state & local spending per capita. Now that's fiscal constraint on the part of our state & local elected officials!

Del. Clagett was right to say Maryland is a low spending state.

 
At April 27, 2008 3:22 PM , Blogger justdafacts said...

To explain further, Peter:

Maryland state government assumes many costs--public school and library employee retirement benefits, for one--that local governments assume in other states.

So when you look at state spending per capita without factoring in local goverment spending, Maryland looks like a high spending state. Several of our state governmet expenditures, however, reduce local government expenditures.

Taken together, the cost of providing state & local goverment services in Maryland is relatively low per capita compared to the other states, as the conservative Tax Foundation table shows. - Steve Lebowitz

PS - You said, "And these rankings don't include the tax increases that have already taken effect!"

Well, they're not going to have an effect, as the spending reductions enacted along with the tax increases result in a net wash (just about balance each other out). - Steve

 

Post a Comment

<< Home